by Mark Morgenfruh | Jul 12, 2025 | Strategic Compensation
If you have the ability to be certain about something instead of leaving it to chance, or gut feelings, why wouldn’t you adopt the data, facts and science to make informed decisions? We help every business in America 
What Are Compensation Surveys and How Can Companies Use Them Strategically?
In today’s fast-changing labor market, setting the right compensation strategy is both an art and a science. Employers must balance competitive pay with internal equity, budget constraints, and talent expectations. To do this effectively, they rely on Compensation Surveys—powerful tools that provide data-driven insights into how other companies are paying their employees.
This article explores what Compensation Surveys are, what they measure, and how companies can use them to make smarter, fairer, and more strategic pay decisions.
What Are Compensation Surveys?
Compensation Surveys—also known as salary surveys or pay surveys—are structured research studies that collect and analyze data about employee pay practices across companies. These surveys provide detailed information about:
- Base salaries
- Bonuses and incentive pay
- Total cash compensation
- Long-term incentives (like stock options)
- Pay ranges by role, level, geography, and industry
- Pay trends, policies, and practices
Surveys are typically conducted by third-party providers (e.g., Mercer, Radford, Culpepper, Willis Towers Watson, Payscale, SHRM), and participation is usually anonymous and confidential. Some surveys are general-market, while others are industry-specific or regional.
Why Compensation Surveys Matter
Compensation surveys provide employers with external benchmarks, helping answer crucial questions like:
- Are we paying competitively for critical roles?
- Where do we stand compared to our peers or competitors?
- Are our incentive plans in line with market trends?
- Are we underpaying or overpaying relative to industry norms?
Without this data, companies risk losing top talent, overextending payroll budgets, or running afoul of equity and compliance standards.
Key Features of Compensation Surveys
High-quality compensation surveys typically include:
- Job-level data: Organized by job title, level (entry to executive), and function
- Geographic filters: Regional, national, and international data for global businesses
- Industry segmentation: Comparisons within specific industries (e.g., tech, healthcare, manufacturing)
- Detailed compensation elements: Base pay, variable pay, total direct compensation
- Job matching tools: To help align internal roles with survey roles
- Customizable reports: Based on the company’s organizational profile
How Companies Use Compensation Surveys
- Benchmarking Pay Competitiveness
The most common use of compensation surveys is to benchmark existing salaries against market rates. HR teams compare their pay ranges and actual salaries for specific roles to those reported by similar organizations.
This process helps:
- Set fair and competitive starting salaries
- Adjust compensation to avoid turnover or offer rejections
- Justify compensation changes to leadership or finance
✅ Example: A mid-sized software company uses a tech-industry survey to confirm that its data engineers are paid 10% below market average. It then adjusts ranges to stay competitive in hiring.
- Designing or Updating Pay Structures
Compensation surveys support the creation or revision of structured salary frameworks, including:
- Pay grades or bands
- Salary ranges and midpoints
- Career path progression models
These structures help promote internal equity and transparency.
✅ Example: A healthcare provider uses survey data to create salary bands for nursing roles across different locations, reflecting local market rates and seniority levels.
- Supporting Compensation Strategy and Budgeting
Surveys provide insight into market trends—such as projected salary increases, incentive pay norms, and remote work differentials—that can inform:
- Annual salary budgets
- Variable pay pools (bonuses, commissions)
- Pay-for-performance frameworks
✅ Example: An HR leader uses compensation trends from surveys to propose a 4% merit increase budget to match rising inflation and competitor moves.
- Global Compensation Planning
For companies with a global presence, compensation surveys offer localized data that reflects pay differences across countries, regions, and cities—factoring in:
- Currency fluctuations
- Cost of living
- Labor laws
- Local talent market conditions
✅ Example: A multinational company compares engineering salaries in London, Bangalore, and São Paulo using a global survey to determine fair and consistent compensation policies.
- Ensuring Pay Equity and Compliance
Compensation surveys provide a critical lens for ensuring external equity (competitive pay) and internal equity (fair pay across similar roles). When used in pay equity audits, surveys help identify and correct discrepancies in:
- Gender pay gaps
- Racial/ethnic pay disparities
- Manager-to-peer pay inconsistencies
This also supports compliance with laws like the Equal Pay Act and emerging pay transparency legislation.
Best Practices for Using Compensation Surveys
- Use Reputable Sources
Choose well-regarded survey providers with rigorous data collection and validation processes. Peer-reviewed surveys ensure accuracy and reliability.
- Match Jobs Accurately
Use job descriptions and responsibilities—not just job titles—to find the best match in the survey. Misalignment can lead to misleading data.
- Segment the Data Thoughtfully
Filter survey results by company size, industry, region, and job level to get the most relevant comparisons.
- Use Multiple Surveys
Cross-referencing data from different surveys can help verify findings and reduce outliers or anomalies.
- Integrate with Compensation Philosophy
Use survey results to inform—not dictate—decisions. Align your findings with your company’s broader compensation strategy and values.
Challenges and Considerations
- Cost: High-quality compensation surveys can be expensive, especially if your organization needs custom reports or global data.
- Time-Intensive Analysis: Interpreting survey data and integrating it into your internal systems requires time, expertise, and often specialized tools.
- Market Volatility: In fast-moving sectors like tech or finance, survey data may become outdated quickly. Supplement with real-time insights when possible.
- Over-reliance: Market data is valuable, but companies must also consider internal equity, culture, and employee preferences when setting pay.
Emerging Trends in Compensation Survey Use
- AI and Real-Time Compensation Platforms: Tools like Payscale and Salary.com are offering more dynamic, real-time data to supplement traditional annual surveys.
- Remote Work Pay Differentials: As companies shift to remote or hybrid models, surveys are capturing location-based pay strategies (e.g., San Francisco vs. Des Moines).
- Total Rewards Benchmarking: Surveys increasingly include non-cash compensation like wellness stipends, mental health resources, and equity compensation.
Conclusion
Compensation surveys are a cornerstone of any informed, fair, and competitive pay strategy. When used correctly, they:
- Strengthen talent acquisition and retention
- Support equitable pay practices
- Guide strategic workforce planning
- Provide credibility in compensation decision-making
For HR leaders and total rewards professionals, understanding and using compensation survey data is not just a technical skill—it’s a strategic imperative in building a strong employer brand an
by Mark Morgenfruh | Jul 11, 2025 | Workforce Dynamics
The critical intersection between labor supply and labor demand often places employers and employees at odds. Does it have to be that way? Does each party really understand the position of the other? We help every business in America
Competing Forces Between Employers and Workers: A Dynamic Balance of Power
The relationship between employers and workers has always been marked by a complex interplay of cooperation, mutual interest, and, at times, competition. While both sides need each other to thrive — employers require labor to drive productivity and profit, and workers rely on employment for livelihood and stability — their interests do not always align. This divergence gives rise to a series of competing forces, shaped by economics, politics, law, social norms, and evolving workplace expectations.
These forces have shifted dramatically over the last century, moving from the Industrial Age to the Information Age, and now to the emerging AI and automation era. Understanding the nature of these competing forces — their causes, manifestations, and outcomes — is essential for fostering more equitable, sustainable, and productive employment relationships.
- Economic Tension: Cost vs. Compensation
One of the most fundamental competing forces is the economic tension between labor cost minimization (employer goal) and fair compensation (employee goal).
- Employer Perspective: Managing Costs
Employers operate within competitive markets where profitability depends, in part, on managing operational expenses. Labor is often the single largest line item in an organization’s budget. To maintain competitive pricing, increase margins, and deliver returns to shareholders, businesses are incentivized to:
- Automate jobs where possible
- Outsource labor to lower-cost regions
- Limit wage increases
- Offer contingent or part-time employment
- Worker Perspective: Earning a Living Wage
Workers, on the other hand, seek adequate compensation for their skills and efforts. They rely on wages not just for basic survival, but also for upward mobility, education, homeownership, and retirement. In many industries, wage stagnation has led to increasing frustration, especially as the cost of living rises faster than incomes.
Resulting Force: This economic conflict has fueled debates over minimum wage laws, unionization, gig work protections, and CEO-to-worker pay ratios.
- Flexibility vs. Stability
A growing point of contention in the 21st-century labor market is the clash between employer demand for flexibility and employee need for stability.
- Employer Perspective: Agility and Adaptability
In rapidly changing markets, companies need to pivot quickly. This has driven a shift toward:
- Short-term contracts
- Freelance and gig work
- On-demand scheduling
- Layoffs during downturns
Such flexibility allows companies to scale labor up or down as needed, controlling risk and optimizing performance.
- Worker Perspective: Predictability and Security
Workers prefer stable employment with predictable hours, long-term prospects, and benefits. Constant job switching, insecure contracts, and variable pay create anxiety, especially for workers with families or financial obligations.
Resulting Force: This conflict manifests in the rise of the gig economy, legal battles over worker classification (e.g., contractors vs. employees), and the growing appeal of union protections.
- Control vs. Autonomy
Another long-standing competing force lies in the degree of control employers exert over work versus the autonomy employee’s desire.
- Employer Perspective: Oversight and Efficiency
Employers benefit from standardizing procedures, monitoring performance, and enforcing company rules. This helps:
- Ensure consistent quality
- Minimize liability
- Drive productivity
- Prevent misuse of company resources
Micromanagement, performance tracking tools, and attendance policies often stem from this imperative.
- Worker Perspective: Trust and Independence
Most employees want to be trusted professionals capable of managing their tasks without excessive supervision. Autonomy fosters:
- Innovation and creativity
- Job satisfaction
- Motivation and ownership
The pandemic-era surge in remote work highlighted this tension — many workers thrived with flexibility, while some employers responded by installing monitoring software.
Resulting Force: This tug-of-war plays out in employee surveillance debates, remote work policies, and flat vs. hierarchical management styles.
- Short-Term Results vs. Long-Term Development
Organizations are often focused on short-term performance, while workers value long-term growth and development.
- Employer Perspective: Meeting Quarterly Goals
Public and private companies alike face pressure to deliver short-term results. This can mean:
- Prioritizing immediate KPIs over talent investment
- Cutting training budgets
- Hiring externally rather than promoting internally
Leadership may prioritize short-term shareholder returns at the expense of workforce morale or development.
- Worker Perspective: Career Progression
Employees want opportunities to grow through:
- Skill development
- Promotions
- Mentorship
- Continued education
They are more loyal to organizations that invest in their careers. When this investment is absent, top talent is likely to leave.
Resulting Force: This dynamic contributes to high turnover, job-hopping trends among younger workers, and the popularity of companies known for strong learning and development programs.
- Profit Maximization vs. Employee Well-being
In a profit-driven business model, decisions that optimize revenue don’t always align with what’s best for employee health, happiness, or balance.
- Employer Perspective: Efficiency First
Companies aim to reduce downtime and increase output. In doing so, they may:
- Extend working hours
- Encourage overtime
- Limit paid leave
- Expect constant connectivity (especially in salaried or remote roles)
This drive is amplified in competitive industries like finance, tech, and manufacturing.
- Worker Perspective: Mental and Physical Health
Burnout, stress, and work-life imbalance are rampant in many sectors. Employees are increasingly advocating for:
- Mental health days
- Four-day workweeks
- Right-to-disconnect laws
- Family-friendly policies
Resulting Force: Conflicting priorities often lead to employee disengagement, mental health crises, and absenteeism. The organizations that prioritize well-being often outperform those that don’t, but it requires cultural change.
- Standardization vs. Inclusion
Employers benefit from streamlined hiring and workplace procedures, but these practices can unintentionally exclude diverse talent.
- Employer Perspective: “Culture Fit” and Efficiency
Hiring for “fit” can accelerate integration and reduce conflict. However, it can also reinforce sameness and unintentionally exclude candidates from underrepresented backgrounds.
Standardized procedures might also miss nuances important for inclusivity — such as accessibility accommodations, pronoun usage, or religious observances.
- Worker Perspective: Equity and Belonging
Employees want to be seen, valued, and included. This requires:
- Inclusive recruitment
- Fair evaluation systems
- Diversity of leadership
- Safe environments for underrepresented groups
Resulting Force: The push for DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) has gained momentum, but also backlash. True inclusion often requires employers to rethink systems that have long prioritized efficiency over equity.
- Globalization and Outsourcing vs. Local Employment
Global labor markets have transformed the employer-worker dynamic, especially in manufacturing, technology, and customer service.
- Employer Perspective: Cost and Access to Talent
By outsourcing or offshoring, employers can reduce costs and access specialized skills not readily available domestically.
This helps companies grow quickly and compete globally but can reduce domestic job opportunities.
- Worker Perspective: Job Displacement and Reskilling
Local workers often face job losses or wage suppression due to outsourcing. Reskilling programs are not always accessible or effective.
Resulting Force: This macro-level conflict shapes trade policy, political debate, and public attitudes toward immigration and automation.
- Information Asymmetry and Bargaining Power
In many employment relationships, employers hold more information and negotiation power than workers.
- Employer Advantage
Employers often control:
- Salary benchmarks
- Promotion criteria
- Internal job opportunities
- Layoff decisions
Without transparency, workers may be underpaid or overlooked without recourse.
- Worker Advocacy
Unions, worker advocacy groups, and legislation like pay transparency laws aim to balance this power disparity.
Resulting Force: Information asymmetry creates mistrust. Organizations that foster transparency and open communication reduce conflict and improve engagement.
Toward Reconciliation: Building a Better Balance
While competing forces are inevitable, adversarial dynamics are not. Forward-thinking employers and empowered employees can find common ground through:
- Employee Voice and Engagement
Creating formal and informal channels for employee feedback helps organizations understand evolving needs.
- Fair Compensation and Transparent Practices
Benchmarking, pay equity audits, and open promotion pathways reduce resentment and disengagement.
- Shared Purpose and Mission
When employees feel aligned with a company’s goals and values, they are more willing to work collaboratively.
- Flexible Work Models
Remote work, compressed weeks, or hybrid roles allow organizations to remain agile while meeting employee lifestyle needs.
- Responsible Leadership
Empathetic leaders who model transparency, integrity, and fairness can bridge many of the divides inherent in employer-employee relationships.
Conclusion
The competing forces between employers and workers are deeply rooted in economic, social, and organizational realities. They are not inherently negative; rather, they reflect the different priorities and pressures each side experiences. When these forces are acknowledged and balanced through empathy, negotiation, and innovative thinking, they can produce dynamic and resilient workplaces.
A workplace is not just a site of production — it’s a living ecosystem of relationships, values, and aspirations. The healthiest organizations are those that view the employment relationship not as a zero-sum game, but as a co-created partnership built on fairness, respect, and shared success.
by Mark Morgenfruh | Jul 11, 2025 | HR Audits
Ignorance is not bliss when it comes to HR Compliance, HR Technology, attracting and retaining talent, professional growth and advancement, Total Rewards, etc. An HR Audit, done on your terms and not because you were forced to conduct one, is a powerful tool to protect and grow your company. We help every business in America
________________________________________
How a Human Resources Audit Can Protect a Company and Help It Adopt Best Practices
In the ever-evolving landscape of business operations, Human Resources (HR) has moved far beyond administrative functions to become a strategic pillar of organizational success. Companies are increasingly recognizing the importance of aligning their HR practices with legal standards, operational goals, and workforce expectations. One of the most effective tools to ensure this alignment is the Human Resources audit—a systematic, objective review of HR policies, procedures, documentation, and systems.
An HR audit is not just a compliance exercise. It is a proactive, strategic tool that helps businesses identify risks, close operational gaps, and adopt industry best practices. From improving employee satisfaction to minimizing legal liabilities, the benefits of an HR audit are both protective and performance-enhancing.
________________________________________
1. Understanding What an HR Audit Is
A Human Resources audit is a comprehensive method for evaluating an organization’s HR policies, practices, and systems. It assesses how well the HR function supports the organization’s goals, adheres to legal regulations, and meets employee needs. HR audits may focus on specific areas—like compliance, benefits, hiring practices, or performance management—or they may cover all areas comprehensively.
Typically, HR audits include a review of:
• Recruitment and onboarding procedures
• Employee files and documentation
• Payroll and compensation practices
• Benefits administration
• Employee relations policies
• Training and development programs
• Performance evaluation systems
• Termination procedures
• Compliance with labor laws and regulations
The outcome of an HR audit is usually a detailed report identifying areas of strength, risk, and opportunity, along with actionable recommendations for improvement.
________________________________________
2. Protecting the Company from Legal Risks
One of the most critical reasons to conduct an HR audit is to ensure compliance with employment laws and regulations. Non-compliance—whether intentional or due to oversight—can result in lawsuits, fines, and reputational damage.
HR audits help ensure compliance with key areas such as:
• Wage and hour laws (e.g., minimum wage, overtime)
• Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and anti-discrimination statutes
• Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and other leave laws
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations
• Immigration and Form I-9 requirements
• Harassment and workplace conduct standards
By identifying gaps and inconsistencies, the audit enables the organization to correct issues before they become legal liabilities. For example, improperly classified employees (exempt vs. non-exempt) or inconsistent disciplinary practices can lead to expensive class-action suits if not addressed.
________________________________________
3. Identifying Operational Inefficiencies
HR audits shine a light on inefficiencies and redundancies in HR systems and processes. For instance, outdated recruitment practices, disorganized employee records, or manual payroll systems can waste time and money. An audit can recommend automation, process improvements, or better vendor solutions to streamline operations.
Efficiency not only saves costs but also enhances the employee experience. Streamlined HR operations mean faster responses to employee questions, quicker onboarding processes, and more effective support for the business units. In a fast-paced business environment, these improvements can make a critical difference in competitiveness and talent retention.
________________________________________
4. Improving Employee Experience and Engagement
The employee experience begins with the first job posting and continues through onboarding, performance management, career development, and even exit interviews. An HR audit can evaluate how well these processes support a positive, engaging work environment.
Key areas often reviewed include:
• Quality and clarity of job descriptions
• Consistency and fairness in performance evaluations
• Availability of learning and development opportunities
• Access to wellness programs and mental health support
• Responsiveness to employee feedback and concerns
When employees feel that HR systems are fair, transparent, and supportive, they are more likely to be engaged, productive, and loyal. An audit helps HR teams identify areas that may be unintentionally creating frustration or disengagement.
________________________________________
5. Benchmarking Against Best Practices
One of the most transformative benefits of an HR audit is its ability to benchmark internal HR practices against industry standards and best practices. As the world of work evolves—especially with shifts like remote work, DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) efforts, and the rise of employee well-being—companies must adapt quickly to remain competitive and compliant.
An HR audit reveals whether:
• Your compensation structures are competitive
• Your benefits offerings reflect current workforce expectations
• Your training programs meet modern skills demands
• Your diversity and inclusion policies reflect best-in-class practices
• Your HR technology stack is up to date
By comparing your systems to those of high-performing companies, you gain a roadmap for future growth and innovation.
________________________________________
6. Strengthening Talent Acquisition and Retention
Hiring and retaining top talent is one of the biggest challenges facing organizations today. An HR audit provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of your recruitment, selection, and onboarding strategies. Are your job postings inclusive? Are you hiring in compliance with applicable laws? Is your onboarding process welcoming and effective?
Audits can identify:
• Bottlenecks in the hiring process
• Gaps in employer branding or job marketing
• Inconsistencies in candidate evaluation
• Lack of diversity in sourcing channels
On the retention side, audits review turnover trends, employee satisfaction data, and exit interview findings to uncover patterns. If turnover is high in specific departments or roles, the audit can recommend interventions such as training, workload redistribution, or leadership changes.
________________________________________
7. Enhancing Organizational Culture and Ethics
HR plays a vital role in shaping and maintaining organizational culture. An HR audit examines whether your values are being upheld in practice, not just in mission statements. It looks at whether policies are applied consistently and fairly, and whether employees feel safe reporting misconduct.
Part of the audit may include:
• Reviewing codes of conduct and ethics policies
• Assessing how complaints and grievances are handled
• Evaluating whether training programs address respect, inclusion, and harassment
• Measuring the presence and impact of anonymous reporting systems
A culture of fairness, transparency, and accountability is one of the most powerful drivers of performance and trust. The HR audit helps reveal gaps between desired culture and actual practice.
________________________________________
8. Mitigating Risks During Organizational Change
When companies go through major transitions—such as mergers, acquisitions, restructurings, or leadership changes—the HR function is often under stress. An audit during or immediately after such transitions ensures that the company is staying on track legally and culturally.
For example, post-merger audits can ensure that:
• Employee handbooks and policies are aligned
• Pay equity is maintained across merged teams
• Benefits integration is handled smoothly
• Reductions in force are conducted lawfully and respectfully
Without a clear understanding of the HR risks involved, change can lead to confusion, morale issues, or legal disputes. An audit provides clarity and control during otherwise uncertain times.
________________________________________
9. Strengthening Recordkeeping and Data Management
Proper documentation and data handling are essential in today’s data-driven world—especially as privacy regulations grow more stringent. An HR audit assesses whether the company is maintaining appropriate employee files, safeguarding sensitive data, and following retention requirements.
It also reviews systems for:
• Secure storage and access of employee records
• Timely and accurate updates to records (e.g., promotions, status changes)
• Compliance with data privacy laws like GDPR or CCPA
• Data analytics capabilities for workforce planning
Improved recordkeeping not only ensures compliance but also enhances the ability to make data-informed decisions about workforce strategy.
________________________________________
10. Guiding Strategic Workforce Planning
A forward-looking HR audit does more than assess the present—it helps prepare for the future. By analyzing workforce demographics, skills inventories, succession plans, and training initiatives, the audit can inform strategic decisions about talent development.
This may include:
• Identifying skills gaps for future business needs
• Assessing the readiness of internal talent pipelines
• Planning for retirements or leadership transitions
• Evaluating reskilling and upskilling initiatives
In this way, an HR audit serves as a strategic lens through which the organization can align its people strategy with long-term business goals.
________________________________________
11. Improving Communication and Policy Consistency
Inconsistent communication of HR policies can lead to confusion, dissatisfaction, and even legal risk. An HR audit evaluates how well HR policies are communicated to employees—through handbooks, orientation sessions, intranet platforms, or manager briefings.
The audit can identify whether:
• Employees know where to find important policies
• Policies are written in clear, accessible language
• Managers are applying rules consistently
• Updates to policies are tracked and distributed properly
Consistent communication fosters trust and clarity, ensuring that employees and managers operate from the same understanding.
________________________________________
Conclusion
A Human Resources audit is far more than a checklist exercise—it is a powerful tool for organizational protection, performance enhancement, and future readiness. From legal compliance and operational efficiency to culture alignment and talent optimization, HR audits provide deep insight and strategic direction.
In a business environment where people are your most valuable asset, regularly auditing your HR systems is not just wise—it is essential. By taking a proactive, comprehensive approach to reviewing and improving HR practices, companies can safeguard against risks, maximize the potential of their workforce, and position themselves as leaders in ethical, people-centric business practices.
by Mark Morgenfruh | Jul 10, 2025 | HR Leadership
Does your HR department understand where they fit? By no means are administrative support functions second-class citizens. But if a department doesn’t generate revenue or execute operations and service delivery to clients, they need to understand how they can best create value for the company and are a valued contributor to everyone’s success.
We help every business in America
Why People Over Process is Critical in Service-oriented Professions
In the world of business, few adages resonate as deeply as “people over process,” especially within service-oriented professions. Whether in human resources, marketing, accounting, IT, etc., the success of service departments hinges far more on reducing the administrative workload on the business and adaptability than on policies, rules, rigid systems and standardized workflows. While processes are undeniably necessary to ensure consistency, compliance, and efficiency, placing them above the human element can severely limit an organization’s ability to meet client needs, foster trust, and retain top talent. This article explores why prioritizing people over process is essential in service-oriented professions, the risks of process-first thinking, and how organizations can cultivate cultures that elevate the human experience.
________________________________________
Understanding the Nature of Service Professions
Service professions are fundamentally interpersonal. They involve delivering value through direct human interaction rather than the production of tangible goods. Examples include:
• Human Resources
• IT
• Accounting
• Billing
• Marketing
In all these cases, the experience of the internal customer is largely determined by the behavior, attitude, knowledge, and responsiveness of the service provider. Thus, the human element is not a feature of the service — it is the service.
Processes exist to support this delivery, but they cannot replicate the warmth, intuition, or critical thinking that people bring to dynamic situations. Service environments are often unpredictable, requiring professionals to adapt, empathize, and personalize their responses — actions that cannot be fully captured in a process manual.
________________________________________
The Limits of Process-First Thinking
While processes are essential for ensuring compliance, safety, and consistency, overreliance on process can be detrimental in service-oriented contexts. Here’s how process-first thinking can go wrong:
1. Dehumanization of the Client or Customer
When service providers are bound too tightly to scripts or protocols, interactions can feel cold, robotic, and impersonal. No one wants to feel like a number; a customer doesn’t want to be told, “that’s not our policy” when they need help.
2. Inflexibility in Complex Situations
Service professionals often face complex, unique scenarios that don’t fit neatly into a pre-defined process. Strict adherence to rules can prevent making real-time decisions that would best serve the client.
For example, an HR professional executing the payroll transaction for the operations manager instead of rejecting their submission and sending it back for them to figure out what is wrong. A support agent might have to offer an unapproved workaround to retain a frustrated customer. In these moments, prioritizing the human need over the process can make all the difference.
3. Reduced Employee Autonomy and Morale
Overemphasis on process can lead to micromanagement and stifle initiative. Employees begin to feel like cogs in a machine, unable to think critically or act with empathy. This erodes morale, reduces engagement, and increases turnover — especially among top talent who value purpose and autonomy.
4. Stifled Innovation
When workers are discouraged from deviating from the process, opportunities for improvement go unnoticed. Employees on the front lines often have valuable insights into administrative pain points and service inefficiencies. But a culture of rigid process adherence discourages experimentation and feedback.
________________________________________
Why People Should Come First
In service professions, prioritizing people — both clients and employees — over process leads to better outcomes, stronger relationships, and long-term success. Here’s why:
1. Empathy Drives Loyalty and Trust
Clients don’t remember the process; they remember how you made them feel. Empathy, patience, and a willingness to listen leave a lasting impression. A customer may forgive a mistake if the person helping them is compassionate and sincere. However, even a flawless process cannot make up for a cold or indifferent interaction.
Building fierce customer loyalty is achieved not through rigid adherence to procedure, but by empowering employees to be human, to make decisions, and going the extra mile.
2. Adaptability is Essential in Service-oriented Delivery
No two clients are the same. Their expectations, emotions, and circumstances vary widely. A one-size-fits-all process simply cannot meet every need. By putting people first, service professionals can tailor their approach in real time, demonstrating emotional intelligence and situational awareness.
3. Employee Empowerment Enhances Engagement
When employees are trusted to use their judgment, they feel valued. They are more likely to take ownership, invest emotionally in their work, and advocate for the organization’s mission. Empowerment also leads to faster resolution of problems, more satisfied clients, and better outcomes overall.
In contrast, employees who are constrained by rigid rules often disengage, operate defensively, or burn out. They view administrative tasks as interruptions or compliance risks, rather than important transactions.
4. People Over Process Fosters Innovation
When people are encouraged to think creatively and improve the customer experience, innovation thrives. Service professionals can identify broken processes, suggest improvements, or pilot new approaches that increase efficiency and satisfaction. Over time, these grassroots innovations can drive significant competitive advantage.
________________________________________
Balancing People and Process: A Symbiotic Relationship
While the mantra “people over process” emphasizes the importance of the human element, it doesn’t mean eliminating process altogether. Instead, the goal is to design processes that serve people, not constrain them.
A. Processes as Tools, Not Constraints
Processes should act as supportive scaffolding that guide employees, ensures safety, and provides consistency — but leaves room for discretion. For example:
• The administrative professional approving a form in an online queue instead of rejecting it for the sake of process
• Requiring rigid and wasteful rules be followed that serve no purpose for the organization or it’s people
• Forcing mandated rules and process steps under the guise of necessity, but then never using the data for any purpose whatsoever
B. Training to Enable Judgment and Empathy
Empowering people over process requires investment in training. Service professionals need more than procedural knowledge — they need:
• Emotional intelligence: to read situations and respond appropriately
• Critical thinking: to solve problems creatively
• Communication skills: to build rapport and manage conflict
• Cultural competence: to serve diverse populations effectively
When these skills are cultivated, employees can navigate complex service environments with confidence and compassion.
C. Feedback Loops to Evolve Process
Organizations should actively solicit feedback from internal customers. What’s working? What’s getting in the way? Processes should be regularly updated based on frontline insights, not dictated exclusively from the top down.
________________________________________
Leadership’s Role in Championing People Over Process
Leaders play a crucial role in shaping organizational culture. To truly prioritize people over process, leaders must:
• Model human-first behavior: Demonstrate empathy in their own interactions.
• Recognize and reward people-centric actions: Celebrate employees who go above and beyond for internal clients.
• Encourage open communication: Create psychological safety so employees feel comfortable speaking up.
• Protect time for human connection: Avoid overloading staff with administrative tasks that detract from client engagement.
• Invest in people: Training, development, and wellness initiatives all reinforce the organization’s commitment to its workforce.
________________________________________
Conclusion: The Human Advantage
In an era of automation, AI, and standardization, the human touch has become more valuable than ever. Processes can streamline delivery, but they cannot replace the creativity, compassion, or judgment of a well-trained service professional. When organizations prioritize people over process — when they design systems that serve humans rather than the other way around — they build resilience, trust, and long-term success.
Ultimately, service is not about ticking boxes or following scripts. It’s about understanding, responding, and connecting. In a service profession, the most powerful tool is not the process map — it’s the person.
by Mark Morgenfruh | Jul 10, 2025 | HR Compliance, HR Handbooks
HR Handbooks are essential tools for compliance to federal and state laws that apply to your company. Do you have one? How do you keep up with all the changing laws? Would you like to remove this headache forever? We help every business in America
________________________________________
How Many Federal and State Employment and Labor Laws Change Each Year — And Why It Matters
Technically speaking, having just one employee triggers requirements for employers to follow various federal and state employment laws.
In today’s highly regulated business environment, employers must navigate a complex web of federal, state, and local employment laws. These laws touch on virtually every aspect of the employee lifecycle — from hiring to termination — and they are anything but static. Each year, dozens to hundreds of employment and labor laws are enacted, amended, or reinterpreted at both the federal and state levels. The sheer volume and frequency of these changes pose a significant compliance challenge for businesses of all sizes.
Understanding the scope and pace of these changes is essential for HR professionals, business leaders, and legal counsel. Staying ahead of evolving legislation not only helps companies avoid costly penalties and litigation, but also ensures that workplace practices reflect current standards for fairness, safety, and equity.
________________________________________
A Constantly Evolving Legal Landscape
There is no fixed number of labor and employment laws that change each year — the number fluctuates based on political, economic, and social factors. However, it is common for hundreds of legislative updates, regulatory changes, and judicial decisions related to employment to occur annually across the United States.
Here’s a breakdown of where and how these changes originate:
1. Federal Law Changes
At the federal level, major employment laws are governed by agencies such as:
• U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
• National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
• Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (in areas like payroll and benefits)
Each year, these agencies issue new regulations, update compliance guidance, and adjust thresholds or penalties for existing laws such as:
• Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
• Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
• Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
• Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
• Affordable Care Act (ACA)
• Occupational health and safety laws
For example, the minimum salary threshold for exempt employees under the FLSA has changed multiple times in the past decade, and OSHA frequently updates safety guidelines and reporting requirements. Additionally, the EEOC may issue new guidance on discrimination or harassment standards, particularly in response to evolving societal issues like gender identity or remote work dynamics.
2. State Law Changes
States are often more active than the federal government in passing new employment laws. In a single year, a typical U.S. state may enact or amend dozens of labor-related statutes and regulations.
Key areas of state-level changes include:
• Minimum wage increases
• Paid family and sick leave mandates
• Pay transparency laws
• Ban-the-box laws (affecting criminal history in hiring)
• Non-compete and restrictive covenant limitations
• Workplace harassment and training requirements
• Marijuana use and drug testing laws
For instance, over half of U.S. states raised their minimum wage in 2024, either through legislative action or inflation-adjusted automatic increases. Some states, like California, regularly lead the nation in progressive labor law initiatives — from mandating pay data reporting to regulating scheduling practices in certain industries.
In recent years, new state privacy laws (e.g., California Consumer Privacy Act – CCPA, and its employment-related provisions) have also introduced compliance complexities for employers handling employee data.
3. Local Ordinances
In addition to federal and state laws, cities and counties are increasingly enacting their own labor standards. These may include:
• Local minimum wages
• Predictive scheduling rules
• Paid leave ordinances
• Anti-discrimination laws with broader protections than federal/state laws
For example, Seattle, San Francisco, and New York City have all implemented robust local employment regulations that exceed state or federal standards. This means that employers with multiple locations must track and comply with a mosaic of requirements, which can change frequently.
________________________________________
Why So Many Changes?
Several factors drive the high frequency of employment law changes each year:
• Political shifts: Changes in federal or state administrations often result in regulatory reversals or expansions, especially concerning labor rights and employer obligations.
• Social movements: Public awareness around issues like workplace harassment, wage inequality, and DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) leads to rapid legislative responses.
• Economic conditions: Recessions, inflation, and labor shortages influence updates in unemployment law, wage protections, and workforce classifications (e.g., gig workers).
• Technology and remote work: New laws are emerging to address virtual work arrangements, cybersecurity, and employee surveillance.
• Court rulings: Judicial decisions, especially at the appellate and Supreme Court level, can redefine how laws are interpreted, requiring employers to adjust practices even without new legislation.
________________________________________
The Risk of Falling Behind
Failing to keep up with these changes can expose companies to serious risks, including:
• Lawsuits and class actions over wage-and-hour violations or discriminatory practices
• Regulatory audits and fines from agencies like the DOL or IRS
• Employee dissatisfaction and turnover due to non-compliant or outdated policies
• Damage to reputation, especially in cases involving harassment or workplace inequities
For example, a company that doesn’t update its policies to reflect new state requirements around paid family leave could face penalties and negative publicity, even if the lapse was unintentional.
________________________________________
Best Practices for Staying Compliant
Given the volume and pace of employment law changes, employers must take proactive steps:
1. Conduct regular HR audits to assess compliance with current laws at the federal, state, and local levels.
2. Subscribe to legal updates from reputable sources like SHRM, law firms, or government agencies.
3. Use compliance-focused HR technology that automatically flags or updates regulatory requirements.
4. Train HR teams and managers annually on evolving legal obligations.
5. Engage legal counsel or labor law experts to review employee handbooks, contracts, and workplace policies.
________________________________________
Conclusion
In a typical year, dozens to hundreds of employment and labor law changes ripple across the United States, affecting everything from how employees are hired and paid to how their data is handled. These changes can emerge quickly, overlap across jurisdictions, and carry steep consequences for businesses that don’t adapt.
In this dynamic landscape, staying informed, agile, and compliant is not just an HR responsibility — it’s a strategic business imperative. Organizations that prioritize legal compliance and proactive policy management are better positioned to build trust, retain talent, and succeed in a highly regulated world of work.
